Kim v. Potter

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 11, 2011
• Docket: 10-1737
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1737

EUN S. KIM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JACK POTTER, PMG/CEO, US Postal Service; WENDY MCELWAIN, Plant Manager; DAVE PRESTON, Supervisor, Distribution Operations Time & Attendance Collections System Office; CHI THAI; CARY WINDSOR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-02973-DKC)

Submitted: January 26, 2011 Decided: March 11, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eun S. Kim, Appellant Pro Se. Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eun S. Kim appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her employment discrimination action pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(l). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Kim v. Potter, No. 8:09-cv-02973-DKC (D.

Md. June 2, 2010). We deny the motion for appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED