Kim v. National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 29, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2012-0054·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SAE YOUNG KIM, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 12-54 (RJL) ) NATIONAL CERTIFICATION ) COMMISSION FOR ACUPUNCTURE ) AND ORIENTAL MEDICINE, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

For the reasons set !Orth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this~ day of August 2012, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendanfs Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs'

Complaint [Dkt. #6] is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Remand to State Court [Dkt. # 11] is

DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kim v. National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, (D.D.C. 2012).

Kim v. National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (Kim v. National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.