Kim v. National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine
This text of Kim v. National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (Kim v. National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SAE YOUNG KIM, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 12-54 (RJL) ) NATIONAL CERTIFICATION ) COMMISSION FOR ACUPUNCTURE ) AND ORIENTAL MEDICINE, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER
For the reasons set !Orth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this~ day of August 2012, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendanfs Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs'
Complaint [Dkt. #6] is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Remand to State Court [Dkt. # 11] is
DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kim v. National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kim-v-national-certification-commission-for-acupun-dcd-2012.