Kim v. Medimmune, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Kim v. Medimmune, Inc.

122 F. App'x 41

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 2005

DocketNo. 04-2120

StatusPublished

This text of 122 F. App'x 41 (Kim v. Medimmune, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kim v. Medimmune, Inc., 122 F. App'x 41 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Su Hyon Kim appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging termination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kim v. MedImmune, Inc., No. CA-03-3149-PJM (D. Md. filed Aug. 17, 2004; entered Aug. 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Su Hyon Kim appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging termination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kim v. MedImmune, Inc., No. CA-03-3149-PJM (D. Md. filed Aug. 17, 2004; entered Aug. 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 F. App'x 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kim-v-medimmune-inc-ca4-2005.