Kim Pinckard v. Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
DecidedJune 18, 2026
Docket10-26-00033-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kim Pinckard v. Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins (Kim Pinckard v. Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kim Pinckard v. Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas

10-26-00033-CV

Kim Pinckard, Appellant

v.

Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins, Appellees

On appeal from the 249th District Court of Johnson County, Texas Judge Tiffany Strother, presiding Trial Court Cause No. DC-C202500486

JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant was notified by letter from the Clerk of this Court that the

Appellant’s Brief was due on or before May 7, 2026. The brief was not filed

and no motion for extension was received. On May 14, 2026, Appellant was

notified by letter from the Clerk of this Court that the brief had not been filed

and that the brief or a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal was filed on or before June 4, 2026, the appeal would be dismissed. Neither the

brief nor a response have been received by this Court.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution and for the

failure to follow a directive of the Clerk of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b), (c).

LEE HARRIS Justice

OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: June 18, 2026 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Appeal dismissed CV06

Pinckard v. Pace Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kim Pinckard v. Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kim-pinckard-v-melinda-strohmeyer-pace-karen-strohmeyer-morgan-anthony-txctapp10-2026.