Kim Pinckard v. Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins
Opinion
Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-26-00033-CV
Kim Pinckard,
Appellant
v.
Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins,
Appellees
On appeal from the
249th District Court of Johnson County, Texas Judge Tiffany Strother, presiding Trial Court Cause No. DC-C202500486
JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant was notified by letter from the Clerk of this Court that the Appellant’s Brief was due on or before May 7, 2026. The brief was not filed and no motion for extension was received. On May 14, 2026, Appellant was notified by letter from the Clerk of this Court that the brief had not been filed and that the brief or a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal was filed on or before June 4, 2026, the appeal would be dismissed. Neither the brief nor a response have been received by this Court.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution and for the failure to follow a directive of the Clerk of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
LEE HARRIS
Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: June 18, 2026 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Appeal dismissed CV06
Pinckard v. Pace Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kim Pinckard v. Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins (Kim Pinckard v. Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.