Kim Elise Arthur, A/K/A Kim Elise Maynor v. John MacDonald

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 30, 2010·No. 02-10-00268-CV·Published

Opinion

02-10-268-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-268-CV

KIM ELISE ARTHUR, A/K/A                                                                APPELLANT

KIM ELISE MAYNOR

                                                             V.

JOHN MACDONALD                                                                             APPELLEE

                                                        ----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

On September 8, 2010, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk=s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2).  See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).  We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk=s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  September 30, 2010



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kim Elise Arthur, A/K/A Kim Elise Maynor v. John MacDonald, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Kim Elise Arthur, A/K/A Kim Elise Maynor v. John MacDonald (Kim Elise Arthur, A/K/A Kim Elise Maynor v. John MacDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.