Kim Camille Florence v. State of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 4, 2025·No. A26E0081·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 04, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26E0081. FLORENCE v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

Pro se petitioner Kim Camille Florence filed a Rule 40(b) emergency motion1 seeking a writ of mandamus and injunctive relief. Florence’s request for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Ct. App. R. 40(c); Arnold v. Alexander, 321 Ga. 330, 335 (1) (914 SE2d 311) (2025). Florence’s request for injunctive relief similarly is DENIED. See City of Duluth v. Riverbrooke Properties, 233 Ga. App. 46, 55 (4) (502 SE2d 806) (1998).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/04/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Although Florence’s motion appears to be styled, in part, as a discretionary application, it was not docketed as such given the absence of a written order. See OCGA § 5-6-35(c); Ct. App. R. 31(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kim Camille Florence v. State of Georgia, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Kim Camille Florence v. State of Georgia (Kim Camille Florence v. State of Georgia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Duluth v. Riverbrooke Properties, Inc.
502 S.E.2d 806 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Arnold v. Alexander
914 S.E.2d 311 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025)