Kilsheimer v. Kendal
158 A.D. 948, 143 N.Y.S. 1125
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1913
StatusPublished
This text of 158 A.D. 948 (Kilsheimer v. Kendal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kilsheimer v. Kendal, 158 A.D. 948, 143 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
Opinion
Motion denied, without costs, with leave to renew if the appeal is not diligently prosecuted. Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
158 A.D. 948, 143 N.Y.S. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilsheimer-v-kendal-nyappdiv-1913.