Kilpatrick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kilpatrick v. State

622 So. 2d 1032, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7676, 1993 WL 273711

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 21, 1993

DocketNo. 92-00176

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 622 So. 2d 1032 (Kilpatrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kilpatrick v. State, 622 So. 2d 1032, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7676, 1993 WL 273711 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his sentences for robbery without a gun, aggravated assault and grand theft. We affirm appellant’s sentences as a habitual offender based on [1033]*1033King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 602 So.2d 942 (Fla.1992). We do remand, however, for appellant’s sentence to be amended to reflect proper credit for time served as required by Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941, (Fla.1993).

FRANK, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his sentences for robbery without a gun, aggravated assault and grand theft. We affirm appellant’s sentences as a habitual offender based on [1033]*1033King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 602 So.2d 942 (Fla.1992). We do remand, however, for appellant’s sentence to be amended to reflect proper credit for time served as required by Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941, (Fla.1993).

FRANK, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 So. 2d 1032, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7676, 1993 WL 273711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilpatrick-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack