Kilpatrick v. Severain

Eighth Circuit

Kilpatrick v. Severain

125 F. 1003, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4260

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1903

DocketNo. 1,981

StatusPublished

This text of 125 F. 1003 (Kilpatrick v. Severain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kilpatrick v. Severain, 125 F. 1003, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4260 (8th Cir. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. T. J. Mahoney, N. K. Griggs, Alfred Hazlett, and Fulton Jack, for plaintiffs in error. Smyth & Smith, for defendant in error. No opinion. Reversed, at costs of plaintiffs in error, per stipulation of parties, and remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to dismiss the case on the merits, with prejudice to any further action thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. T. J. Mahoney, N. K. Griggs, Alfred Hazlett, and Fulton Jack, for plaintiffs in error. Smyth & Smith, for defendant in error. No opinion. Reversed, at costs of plaintiffs in error, per stipulation of parties, and remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to dismiss the case on the merits, with prejudice to any further action thereon.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 F. 1003, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilpatrick-v-severain-ca8-1903.