Kilpatrick v. Severain

Eighth Circuit

Kilpatrick v. Severain

125 F. 1003, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4260

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 12, 1903·No. No. 1,981·Published

Opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. T. J. Mahoney, N. K. Griggs, Alfred Hazlett, and Fulton Jack, for plaintiffs in error. Smyth & Smith, for defendant in error. No opinion. Reversed, at costs of plaintiffs in error, per stipulation of parties, and remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to dismiss the case on the merits, with prejudice to any further action thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. T. J. Mahoney, N. K. Griggs, Alfred Hazlett, and Fulton Jack, for plaintiffs in error. Smyth & Smith, for defendant in error. No opinion. Reversed, at costs of plaintiffs in error, per stipulation of parties, and remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to dismiss the case on the merits, with prejudice to any further action thereon.

Kilpatrick v. Severain, 125 F. 1003, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4260 (8th Cir. 1903).

Pincite

125 F. 1003 (Kilpatrick v. Severain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.