Kilpatrick v. Harper
119 Ala. 452
Opinion
By the terms of section 3064 of the Code (1886) the relation of landlord and tenant existed between the parties to this suit in respect of the corn sued for. The property therefore belonged to the tenant, the plaintiff, and the defendant, the landlord, had a lien on it for the payment of the rent. It follows that plaintiff was entitled to the possession of the property; and the court did not err, there being' no conflict in the evidence, in giving' the affirmative charge in his faAror.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kilpatrick v. Harper, 119 Ala. 452 (Ala. 1898).
119 Ala. 452 (Kilpatrick v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Spain v. Coley
1916 OK 1026 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Haynes Mercantile Co. v. Bell
50 So. 311 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)