Kilpatrick v. Dade County School Board

606 So. 2d 698, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1992 WL 259783
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 1992·No. No. 91-2012·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Linda Kilpatrick appeals an adverse summary judgment in her action for breach of employment contract. Summary judgment was correctly entered for failure of appellant to exhaust applicable grievance and administrative remedies. See City of Miami v. Fraternal Order of Police, 378 So.2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1113 (Fla.1980).

Appellant’s reliance on Kresse v. City of Hialeah, 539 So.2d 534 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), is misplaced. Kresse holds that an employee need not file a grievance under a collective bargaining agreement where the employee makes a claim directly under the statutory anti-retaliation provision of the worker’s compensation law. Id. at 535; see also Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 108 S.Ct. 1877, 100 L.Ed.2d 410 (1988). The Kresse exception [699] is a very limited one and is not applicable here.

The order under review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kilpatrick v. Dade County School Board, 606 So. 2d 698, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10476, 1992 WL 259783 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

606 So. 2d 698 (Kilpatrick v. Dade County School Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
486 U.S. 399 (Supreme Court, 1988)
City of Miami v. Fraternal Order of Police
378 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Kresse v. City of Hialeah
539 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)