Killpatrick's Appeal

5 A. 8, 113 Pa. 46, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 331
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 10, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was filed

Per Curiam.

There is no merit in this No collusion is shown between the guardians and other persons. Although the repairs and advances were made without previous order of Court, yet they were afterwards ratified and approved by the Court as necessary and proper. The guardian took the risk of being surcharged for making these payments without being so authorized; yet subsequent approval thereof by tlie Court relieves bim from liability. There is no error in the decree: Patterson’s Appeal, 104 Pa. St., 369.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Killpatrick's Appeal, 5 A. 8, 113 Pa. 46, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 331 (Pa. 1886).

5 A. 8 (Killpatrick's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
E.D. California, 2026
In re Estate of Schram
696 A.2d 1206 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)