Killmer v. Sabourin
This text of 873 N.W.2d 314 (Killmer v. Sabourin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting the application for leave to appeal, we vacate the order of the Court of Appeals, and we remand this case to that court for reconsideration of the issues raised by the plaintiffs on the original record or, if filed, for consideration of a motion to expand the record. The panel erred in allowing the defendants to expand the record without first having moved to do so. MCR 7.210(A)(1). The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants is denied, [853]*853because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
873 N.W.2d 314, 499 Mich. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killmer-v-sabourin-mich-2016.