Killion v. Wright

34 Pa. 91
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1859
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Pa. 91 (Killion v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Killion v. Wright, 34 Pa. 91 (Pa. 1859).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Many claims may be joined in one action, and if, for such, separate suits be brought, the court may order them to be consolidated. But if claims may be counted on separately, they are separate causes of action, and a suit for one is no bar to a suit for another. And as a plaintiff is not bound to count for several claims in one action, unless on an order to consolidate, so, when he does so count, he may, with leave of court, withdraw one of them, and then it stands as a claim not sued upon, and may be the subject of a future action. Of course, and a fortiori, when a claim is withdrawn because of an objection by the defendant that it is not yet due, it may be the subject of another action, and the withdrawal cannot be treated as a retraxit.

Judgment affirmed and record remitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Pa. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killion-v-wright-pa-1859.