Killilea v. . Morgan

121 N.E. 869, 224 N.Y. 643, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1049
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 1918·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that McGregor, the superintendent of the estate, must be deemed the alter ego of the defendant, and that for his negligence in failing to correct the‘dangerous condition after notice of its existence, the defendant is responsible (Henry v. Hudson & M. R. R. Co., 201 N. Y. 140; Connolly v. Hall & Grant Const. Co., 192 N. Y. 182, 187).

The judgment should be affirmed with costs.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Killilea v. . Morgan, 121 N.E. 869, 224 N.Y. 643, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1049 (N.Y. 1918).

121 N.E. 869 (Killilea v. . Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. . Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co.
94 N.E. 623 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Connolly v. . Hall Grant Construction Co.
84 N.E. 807 (New York Court of Appeals, 1908)