Killilea v. . Morgan

121 N.E. 869, 224 N.Y. 643, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1049
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 29, 1918
StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.E. 869 (Killilea v. . Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Killilea v. . Morgan, 121 N.E. 869, 224 N.Y. 643, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1049 (N.Y. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that McGregor, the superintendent of the estate, must be deemed the alter ego of the defendant, and that for his negligence in failing to correct the‘dangerous condition after notice of its existence, the defendant is responsible (Henry v. Hudson & M. R. R. Co., 201 N. Y. 140; Connolly v. Hall & Grant Const. Co., 192 N. Y. 182, 187).

The judgment should be affirmed with costs.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. . Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co.
94 N.E. 623 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Connolly v. . Hall Grant Construction Co.
84 N.E. 807 (New York Court of Appeals, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 N.E. 869, 224 N.Y. 643, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killilea-v-morgan-ny-1918.