Killigan v. City of Lake Butler
Opinion
Appellant challenges an order granting appellees’ motion for involuntary dismissal with prejudice, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(b), as a sanction because of appellant’s alleged misrepresentations during discovery. We reverse because the order fails to include any findings whatsoever. See, e.g., Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990); Carr v. Dean Steel Bldgs., Inc., 619 So.2d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Cf. Baker v. Myers Tractor Servs., Inc., 765 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
821 So. 2d 356 (Killigan v. City of Lake Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.