Killian v. State
116 So. 899, 22 Ala. App. 359
Opinion
The questions sought by defendant to be put to the prospective jurors did not, we think, come within the influence of section 8662 of the Code of 1923, and were, by the trial court, in its discretion, properly disallowed.
There was ample evidence to support the verdict of guilt, and it was not error to refuse to give at appellant’s request the general affirmative charge in his favor, or to overrule his motion for a new trial.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Killian v. State, 116 So. 899, 22 Ala. App. 359 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
116 So. 899 (Killian v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Killian v. State
116 So. 899 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)