Killian v. State
This text of 116 So. 899 (Killian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The questions sought by defendant to be put to the prospective jurors did not, we think, come within the influence of section 8662 of the Code of 1923, and were, by the trial court, in its discretion, properly disallowed.
There was ample evidence to support the verdict of guilt, and it was not error to refuse to give at appellant’s request the general affirmative charge in his favor, or to overrule his motion for a new trial.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
116 So. 899, 22 Ala. App. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killian-v-state-alactapp-1928.