Killian v. . Fulbright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Killian v. . Fulbright

25 N.C. 9

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 5, 1842·Published

Opinion

Admitting that the action in this case is to be regarded as a penal action, the nonsuit was, nevertheless, improperly ordered. It was decided in Green v. Mangum, 7 N.C. 39, that the objection taken to the jurisdiction of the court, because the action was not brought in the county where the offense was committed, must be brought forward by plea in abatement, and could not be taken on the general issue.

The judgment of nonsuit must be

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

(11)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Admitting that the action in this case is to be regarded as a penal action, the nonsuit was, nevertheless, improperly ordered. It was decided in Green v. Mangum, 7 N.C. 39, that the objection taken to the jurisdiction of the court, because the action was not brought in the county where the offense was committed, must be brought forward by plea in abatement, and could not be taken on the general issue.

The judgment of nonsuit must be

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

(11)

Killian v. . Fulbright, 25 N.C. 9 (N.C. 1842).

Pincite

25 N.C. 9 (Killian v. . Fulbright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related