Killian v. Clark

Supreme Court

Killian v. Clark

111 U.S. 784, 4 S. Ct. 700, 28 L. Ed. 599, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1838

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 5, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 111 U.S. 784 (Killian v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Killian v. Clark, 111 U.S. 784, 4 S. Ct. 700, 28 L. Ed. 599, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1838 (1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal is dismissed. The decree appealed from.was entered on the 20th of May, 1878, ahd. an appeal afiowed these appellants in open court on the- 22d of May; No bond for thé appeal was given until the 7th of October,, 1881, the day on which the cause was for the first time-docketed here. The appeal of May 22d, 18.78, became inoperative by reason of the failure to give the necessary bond and docket the case here during, the October term, 1878, Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 505, and the acceptance of the bond in October, 1881, cannot have the effect of an allowance of a new appeal, because it was more than two years after the decree had been entered.

:Dismissed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal is dismissed. The decree appealed from.was entered on the 20th of May, 1878, ahd. an appeal afiowed these appellants in open court on the- 22d of May; No bond for thé appeal was given until the 7th of October,, 1881, the day on which the cause was for the first time-docketed here. The appeal of May 22d, 18.78, became inoperative by reason of the failure to give the necessary bond and docket the case here during, the October term, 1878, Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 505, and the acceptance of the bond in October, 1881, cannot have the effect of an allowance of a new appeal, because it was more than two years after the decree had been entered.

:Dismissed.-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 U.S. 784, 4 S. Ct. 700, 28 L. Ed. 599, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killian-v-clark-scotus-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack