Killian-McCombie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
This text of 62 A.3d 498 (Killian-McCombie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION BY
Shannon M. Killian-MeCombie (Claimant) petitions for review of the August 1, 2012, order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR), which reversed the referee’s determination and found Claimant’s severance deductible under the provisions of section 404(d)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1 We affirm.
Claimant was employed as a full-time human resources representative for Land O’Lakes, Inc. (Employer) from March 14, 1994, through March 16, 2012. In December 2011, Employer discussed a separation of employment and a possible severance agreement with Claimant. In January 2012, Employer informed Claimant that her position would be eliminated effective March 16, 2012. (UCBR’s Findings of Fact, Nos. 1-3.)
On March 16, 2012, Claimant signed and accepted a severance agreement. Employer signed the agreement on March 19, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement, Employer paid Claimant $44,135.82 in severance. Claimant filed for unemployment compensation (UC) benefits immediately after her separation from work. Based on Claimant’s regular full-time weekly wage of $1,226.00, Claimant’s weekly benefit rate is $573.00 and her partial benefit credit is $230.00. (UCBR’s Findings of Fact, Nos. 4-10.)
On April 5, 2012, the Altoona UC Service Center (Service Center) determined that Claimant’s severance pay is deductible from her weekly benefit rate under section 404(d)(1) of the Law, beginning with waiting week ending March 24, 2012, and Claimant’s revised weekly benefit rate is $0 for claim weeks ending March 24, 2012, through August 11, 2012, and $150.00 for claim week ending August 18, 2012. Claimant appealed to the referee.
The referee held a hearing and, on June 14, 2012, reversed the Service Center’s determination. The referee determined that Claimant’s severance pay is not deductible under section 404(d)(1) of the Law. Claimant’s weekly benefit rate remains at $573.00. Employer appealed to the UCBR.
On August 1, 2012, the UCBR reversed the referee’s decision determining that Claimant and Employer did not enter into an agreement until after January 1, 2012, and, therefore, Claimant’s severance is deductible under section 404(d)(1) of the Law. Claimant now petitions this court for review.2
[500]*500Claimant contends that the UCBR erred in determining that Claimant’s severance pay is deductible under section 404(d)(1) of the Law. Specifically, Claimant asserts that she and Employer made the severance agreement on December 15, 2011, and that the severance pay is not to be deductible under section 404(d)(1) of the Law because section 404(d)(1) of the Law does not apply to severance agreements agreed to prior to January 1, 2012. We disagree.
Prior to January 1, 2012, severance payments received by an employee from her employer based upon her separation from employment were not deductible from the employee’s UC benefits. Hock v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 50 Pa.Cmwlth. 517, 413 A.2d 444, 448 (1980). However, on January 1, 2012, section 404(d)(l)(iii) of the Law, which requires the deduction of severance payments from UC benefits, became applicable.3
The UCBR found that: (1) in December 2011, Claimant and Employer discussed the elimination of Claimant’s position and severance payments; (2) in January 2012, Employer informed Claimant by letter that Claimant’s position would be eliminated effective March 16, 2012; (3) in a second letter, dated January 18, 2012, Employer notified Claimant of the termination of her employment effective March 16, 20124; and (4) the Separation Agreement and Release, which finalized the severance payable to Claimant, was signed by Claimant on March 16, 2012, and by Employer on March 19, 2012. (UCBR’s Findings of Fact Nos. 2-4.)
“The law is clear that the [UCBR] is the ultimate finder of fact and arbiter of witness credibility. Thus, as long as the [UCBR’s] factual findings are supported [501]*501by substantial evidence, those findings are conclusive on appeal.” Bruce v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 2 A.3d 667, 671 (Pa.Cmwlth.2010) (internal citation omitted). The evidence establishes that although Claimant and Employer discussed potential separation in December 2011, they signed no agreement until after January 1, 2012. We agree with the UCBR that the discussion in December 2011 did not constitute an agreement. Claimant and Employer signed the severance agreement in March 2012. The UCBR did not err in determining that section 404(d)(1) of the Law applied and that Claimant’s severance is deductible from her UC benefits.
Accordingly, we affirm.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of March, 2013, we hereby affirm the August 1, 2012, order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 A.3d 498, 2013 WL 776737, 2013 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killian-mccombie-v-unemployment-compensation-board-of-review-pacommwct-2013.