Killgo v. Hoffman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Killgo v. Hoffman

320 So. 2d 417, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15421

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 21, 1975

DocketNo. 75-653

StatusPublished

This text of 320 So. 2d 417 (Killgo v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Killgo v. Hoffman, 320 So. 2d 417, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15421 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant is one of the defendants in an action on a promissory note brought by ap-pellee in the Circuit Court of Dade County. The court granted summary judgment against the appellant as to liability. It is this order that is being appealed.

It is appellant’s contention that the court erred in entering summary judgment as to liability in that the plaintiff-appellee failed

[418]*418to negate the existence of disputed facts on material issues.

We find merit in appellant’s contention and reverse. See Emile v. First National Bank of Miami, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 305; Harrison v. McCourtney, Fla.App. 1962, 148 So.2d 53; Underwriters Insurance Company v. Sisung, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 461.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI