Killet v. State
32 Ga. 292
Opinion
[294] By the Court
delivering the opinion.
The question upon which this ease turns, as stated in the second exception, was decided after careful consideration at our recent sitting in Macon.
The statute under which this indictment was framed, like all other statutes, .must receive a reasonable construction. We are not satisfied with the construction given to it in the charge of the Court below, and have embodied our own in the judgment of reversal.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Killet v. State, 32 Ga. 292 (Ga. 1861).
32 Ga. 292 (Killet v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCroy v. State
272 S.E.2d 747 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Reeves v. State
197 S.E.2d 843 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Stripling v. State
40 S.E. 733 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)