Killer v. Commonwealth
This text of 16 A. 495 (Killer v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are asked by the first assignment of error to say that “ the evidence in this case does not prove the existence of the ingredients necessar^ to constitute murder in the first degree.” This we cannot do. The evidence pointed clearly to a wilful, deliberate, and brutal murder. The deceased was found in his bed, with his skull crushed in by a blow from some blunt instrument. The heavy iron sash-weight with which it was [99]*99probably clone was lying, covered partly with blood, by his shoulder. His person was covered with a blanket to his neck. When found he was lying as if in sleep. There had been no struggle. One single, crushing blow with the heavy iron weight, whilst sleeping, had evidently ended his life. To say that such an instrument, when so used, is not a deadly weapon, evidencing an intent to take life, is a proposition that does not' require discussion.
The other assignments were not pressed, and are without merit.
The judgment is affirmed, and it is ordered that the record be remitted to the Oyer and Terminer for the purpose of execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A. 495, 124 Pa. 92, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killer-v-commonwealth-pa-1889.