Killabrew v. State
This text of 125 S.E. 725 (Killabrew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the facts of this case, the verdict finding- the accused guilty of an attempt to rob “by force and violence” was unauthorized, and the court erred in overruling- the motion for a new trial. See, in this connection, Barksdale v. State, 24 Ga. App. 115 (100 S. E. 45); Tanner v. State, 24 Ga. App. 132 (100 S. E. 44), and citations; Penny v. State, 114 Ga. 77 (39 S. E. 871); Groves v. State, 116 Ga. 516, 519 (42 S. E. 755, 59 L. R. A. 598); Moss v. State, 6 Ga. App. 525 (65 S. E. 300); Leverett v. State, 20 Ga. App. 748 (93 S. E. 232); Wilburn v. State, 22 Ga. App. 614 (97 S. E. 87).
Judgment reversed.
cited 1 Ga. App. 136.
cited the cases cited in the decision; also 66 Ga. 167; 125 Ga. 259 (2); 111 Ga. 832 (2), 95 Ga. 481.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 S.E. 725, 33 Ga. App. 55, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killabrew-v-state-gactapp-1924.