Kilgour v. Parker

26 Ky. 577, 3 J.J. Marsh. 577, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 126
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedApril 19, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ky. 577 (Kilgour v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kilgour v. Parker, 26 Ky. 577, 3 J.J. Marsh. 577, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 126 (Ky. Ct. App. 1830).

Opinion

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendants in error obtained -a decree against the plaintiffs in error for $180, in com non wealth’s notes, for a note for $100, on a southern bank, charged to have been sold by the plaintiffs to the defendants for $180 in commonwealth’s paper, and which was ascertained afterwards to be counterfeit.

If the defendants have any right to recover, they might obtain reparation by a suit at Jaw. They alleged no fact in their bill, which could transfer to the chancellor,Jurisdiction of their claim to damages.

mi i -ti , . . . , , ,. 1 he bill contains no intimation that a discovery was necessary. The bill is not one for discovery, W herefore, the circuit court had no jurisdiction. See Smith’s exr’s. vs. Clay, III. Bibb, 272.

The decree is therefore reversed, and the cause is . . . i • • . remanded with instructions to dismiss the bill, unless it shall be amended so as to allow tile chancellor to take cognizance of the case; such amendment, if the facts willjustify the defendants in making it, may be Indulged, as the plaintiffs had not answered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ky. 577, 3 J.J. Marsh. 577, 1830 Ky. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilgour-v-parker-kyctapp-1830.