Kilgore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kilgore v. State

132 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 205, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 637

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 3, 1926

Docket17044

StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 272 (Kilgore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kilgore v. State, 132 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 205, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Beoyxes, C. J.

Under the facts of the case, the failure of the court to instruct the jury upon the law of “misfortune or accident” was not error. The remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit; and the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Smith & Taylor, for plaintiff in error. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, S. Holderness, Boykin & Boykin, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beoyxes, C. J.

Under the facts of the case, the failure of the court to instruct the jury upon the law of “misfortune or accident” was not error. The remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit; and the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Smith & Taylor, for plaintiff in error. W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, S. Holderness, Boykin & Boykin, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 205, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilgore-v-state-gactapp-1926.