Kilgore v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Kilgore v. State

159 So. 892, 26 Ala. App. 657

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 1934

Docket6 Div. 720.

StatusPublished

This text of 159 So. 892 (Kilgore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kilgore v. State, 159 So. 892, 26 Ala. App. 657 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury. The only point made is that the evidence is not sufficient to convict.

If the testimony of the two officers is to be believed, there was ample evidence upon whicli to base a judgment of guilt. The credibility of these witnesses was passed, upon by the trial judge, who was in a better position to judge than are we.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury. The only point made is that the evidence is not sufficient to convict.

If the testimony of the two officers is to be believed, there was ample evidence upon whicli to base a judgment of guilt. The credibility of these witnesses was passed, upon by the trial judge, who was in a better position to judge than are we.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 So. 892, 26 Ala. App. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilgore-v-state-alactapp-1934.