Kilgore Seed Co. v. Newsom

155 So. 926, 115 Fla. 591, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1641
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 23, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—Sincethe writ of error was sued out in this case the controlling questions of law presented herein have been considered in other cases and the law applicable thereto enunciated. See Fla. Power & Light Co. v. New-some, opinion filed June 22, 1933, reported 149 Sou. 621, and George Andrews v. First National Bank of Tampa, opinion filed May 25, 1934.

We deem it unnecessary to add anything to what has been said in the two opinions referred to.

On authority of the opinions and judgments in the cases above cited, the judgment herein should be reversed and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., concurs in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kilgore Seed Co. v. Newsom, 155 So. 926, 115 Fla. 591, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1641 (Fla. 1934).

155 So. 926 (Kilgore Seed Co. v. Newsom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Power & Light Co. v. Newsom
149 So. 621 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)