Kiley v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

17 N.E.2d 890, 301 Mass. 570, 1938 Mass. LEXIS 1093
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedDecember 10, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 17 N.E.2d 890 (Kiley v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kiley v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 17 N.E.2d 890, 301 Mass. 570, 1938 Mass. LEXIS 1093 (Mass. 1938).

Opinion

Lummus, J.

The defendant excepted to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict in its favor in an action of tort for negligently causing bodily injury. At its Brockton station the defendant maintained a covered passageway with a floor made of "a cement material having a trade name ‘terrazzo.’ ” In rainy weather the roof leaked and the floor became wet. The floor had settled in places, but one could hardly notice that unless there was water on the floor. On May 3, 1933, when the floor was wet, although the plaintiff did not feel any water under her feet, she “fell into ‘a lot of water,’” about a quarter of an inch deep.

[571]*571Evidence that the floor was wet did not of itself warrant a finding that it was dangerously slippery. Evidence that the plaintiff fell while walking along the wet passageway did not of itself warrant a finding that her fall was caused by slipping or by the wetness of the floor. The evidence falls short of showing that a condition of the floor negligently allowed to exist bore a causal relation to the injury. Pearson v. Director General of Railroads, 245 Mass. 158, 162. See also Tariff v. S. S. Kresge Co. 299 Mass. 129.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pettie v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.
1996 Mass. App. Div. 41 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1996)
Graham v. Stop & Shop, Inc.
32 Mass. App. Dec. 144 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1965)
McVeigh v. McCullough
192 A.2d 437 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1963)
Sellew v. Tuttle's Millinery Inc.
66 N.E.2d 26 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Battista v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
57 N.E.2d 552 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)
Connolly v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
34 N.E.2d 494 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Moors v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
25 N.E.2d 171 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Correira v. Atlantic Amusement Co.
18 N.E.2d 435 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 N.E.2d 890, 301 Mass. 570, 1938 Mass. LEXIS 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiley-v-new-york-new-haven-hartford-railroad-mass-1938.