Kiley v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kiley v. Lavine

51 A.D.2d 572, 378 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10852

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 572 (Kiley v. Lavine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kiley v. Lavine, 51 A.D.2d 572, 378 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the Orange County Commissioner of Social Services denying petitioner’s request for child care services, the State Commissioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 30, 1974, which (1) held that petitioner was entitled to an allowance for day care services since she was enrolled in a full-time, State-approved "vocational rehabilitation” program, and (2) remanded the matter for a further hearing limited to the issue whether petitioner was satisfactorily participating in said program. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Under the circumstances herein, Special Term’s determination was proper (see Matter of Hylton v Nyden, 48 AD2d 913). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur. [78 Misc 2d 785.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the Orange County Commissioner of Social Services denying petitioner’s request for child care services, the State Commissioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 30, 1974, which (1) held that petitioner was entitled to an allowance for day care services since she was enrolled in a full-time, State-approved "vocational rehabilitation” program, and (2) remanded the matter for a further hearing limited to the issue whether petitioner was satisfactorily participating in said program. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Under the circumstances herein, Special Term’s determination was proper (see Matter of Hylton v Nyden, 48 AD2d 913). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur. [78 Misc 2d 785.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 572, 378 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiley-v-lavine-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack