Kile v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kile v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.

537 S.W.3d 378

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 26, 2017

DocketNo. ED 105315

StatusPublished

This text of 537 S.W.3d 378 (Kile v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kile v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co., 537 S.W.3d 378 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■ Bernie and Patricia Kile (“Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of Respondent Shelter- Mutual Insurance Co.’s (“Shelter”) motion for summary judgment in Appellants’ lawsuit against Shelter for insurance coverage following a car accident. In granting summary judgment in favor of Shelter, the trial court ruled that Shelter’s “owned auto exclusion” should be enforced as written to bar Appellants’ uri-derinsured motorist coverage that they sought for injuries they sustained in a car accident on December 24, 2010, under the insurance policies of their three vehicles that they owned but were not involved in the accident. We affirm.

We.have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■ Bernie and Patricia Kile (“Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of Respondent Shelter- Mutual Insurance Co.’s (“Shelter”) motion for summary judgment in Appellants’ lawsuit against Shelter for insurance coverage following a car accident. In granting summary judgment in favor of Shelter, the trial court ruled that Shelter’s “owned auto exclusion” should be enforced as written to bar Appellants’ uri-derinsured motorist coverage that they sought for injuries they sustained in a car accident on December 24, 2010, under the insurance policies of their three vehicles that they owned but were not involved in the accident. We affirm.

We.have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 S.W.3d 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kile-v-shelter-mutual-insurance-co-moctapp-2017.