Kilday v. Alamo Post No. 2, American Legion

Court of Appeals of Texas

Kilday v. Alamo Post No. 2, American Legion

65 S.W.2d 429

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 31, 1933

DocketNo. 9392

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 S.W.2d 429 (Kilday v. Alamo Post No. 2, American Legion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kilday v. Alamo Post No. 2, American Legion, 65 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MURRAY, Justice.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment rendered in the Forty-Fifth district court of Bexar county, granting a temporary injunction against Owen W. Kilday and others, ordering them to refrain and desist .from interfering with appellees herein in the lawful use and possession of the premises at 1202-1212 Navarro street, in San Antonio, Tex., and further enjoining said Kilday and the other appellants in other particulars.

We are met at the threshold of this appeal with a motion to dismiss on the ground, that the appeal bond was prematurely filed, in the lower court. The record- discloses that the appeal bond was filed in the lower court on October 27, 1933, and, that the judgment was rendered on October 28, 1933. Thus the appeal bond was filed the day before the judgment appealed from was actually rendered.

A bond prematurely filed is insufficient to give this court jurisdiction in this cause. Article 2253, R. S. 1925, as amended by Acts 1927, 40th Leg., p. 21, c. 15, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2253); Cooper v. Carter (Tex. Civ. App.) 233 S. W. 1020; Stinnett v. Dudley (Tex. Civ. App.) 277 S. W. 801; Burnette v. Miracle (Tex. Civ. App.) 295 S. W. 214; Burris v. Myers (Tex. Civ. App.) [430]*43049 S.W.(2d) 930; Brinkley v. State (Tex. Civ. App.) 49 S.W.(2d) 516; Swanson v. Holt (Tex. Civ. App.) 56 S.W.(2d) 266.

Accordingly, this appeal will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MURRAY, Justice.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment rendered in the Forty-Fifth district court of Bexar county, granting a temporary injunction against Owen W. Kilday and others, ordering them to refrain and desist .from interfering with appellees herein in the lawful use and possession of the premises at 1202-1212 Navarro street, in San Antonio, Tex., and further enjoining said Kilday and the other appellants in other particulars.

We are met at the threshold of this appeal with a motion to dismiss on the ground, that the appeal bond was prematurely filed, in the lower court. The record- discloses that the appeal bond was filed in the lower court on October 27, 1933, and, that the judgment was rendered on October 28, 1933. Thus the appeal bond was filed the day before the judgment appealed from was actually rendered.

A bond prematurely filed is insufficient to give this court jurisdiction in this cause. Article 2253, R. S. 1925, as amended by Acts 1927, 40th Leg., p. 21, c. 15, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2253); Cooper v. Carter (Tex. Civ. App.) 233 S. W. 1020; Stinnett v. Dudley (Tex. Civ. App.) 277 S. W. 801; Burnette v. Miracle (Tex. Civ. App.) 295 S. W. 214; Burris v. Myers (Tex. Civ. App.) [430]*43049 S.W.(2d) 930; Brinkley v. State (Tex. Civ. App.) 49 S.W.(2d) 516; Swanson v. Holt (Tex. Civ. App.) 56 S.W.(2d) 266.

Accordingly, this appeal will be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 S.W.2d 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilday-v-alamo-post-no-2-american-legion-texapp-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack