Kilcrease v. Kilcrease

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kilcrease v. Kilcrease

223 So. 2d 755, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5713

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1969·No. No. K-199·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed on authority of Shingleton et al. v. Bussey, 223 So.2d 713, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida May 28, 1969.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed on authority of Shingleton et al. v. Bussey, 223 So.2d 713, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida May 28, 1969.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Kilcrease v. Kilcrease, 223 So. 2d 755, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5713 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

223 So. 2d 755 (Kilcrease v. Kilcrease) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related