Kikoyan v. Gonzales
This text of 134 F. App'x 193 (Kikoyan v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Tamara Jora Kikoyan is a native and citizen of Armenia. She appeals a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying her asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture.
Adverse credibility findings are reviewed under the deferential substantial evidence standard and will be upheld unless the evidence compels a contrary result. Melkonian v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 1061, 1065 (9th Cir.2003). In this case, the immigration judge’s adverse credibility decision is amply supported by inconsistencies within Kikoyan’s testimony and inconsistencies between her testimony and her asylum application. In particular, the immigration judge properly gave considerable weight to the fraudulent INS letter. In the absence of credible testimony there is no evidence in the record of past persecution, a well-founded fear of future persecution, or a fear of torture. Accordingly, the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is affirmed.
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kikoyan-v-gonzales-ca9-2005.