Kik v. Sbraccia

268 Mich. App. 801
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 9, 2005
DocketDocket No. 256419
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 268 Mich. App. 801 (Kik v. Sbraccia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kik v. Sbraccia, 268 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

The Court orders that a special panel be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm, 267 Mich App 274; 705 NW2d 136 (2005).

The Court further orders that part III of the opinion released on November 15, 2005, which addresses the availability of damages for loss of consortium in a bodily injury or property damage claim brought pursuant to MCL 691.1405, is vacated. MCR 7.215(J)(5).

Appellants may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk’s certification of this order. Appellees may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellants’ brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.

Gage, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter v. Sisco
832 N.W.2d 753 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2013)
Rebecca Kik v. John-Christopher Sbraccia
Michigan Supreme Court, 2008
Wesche v. Mecosta County Road Commission
746 N.W.2d 847 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)
Kik v. Sbraccia
726 N.W.2d 450 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 Mich. App. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kik-v-sbraccia-michctapp-2005.