Kik v. Sbraccia

Michigan Court of Appeals

Kik v. Sbraccia

268 Mich. App. 801

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided December 9, 2005·No. Docket No. 256419·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The Court orders that a special panel be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm, 267 Mich App 274; 705 NW2d 136 (2005).

The Court further orders that part III of the opinion released on November 15, 2005, which addresses the availability of damages for loss of consortium in a bodily injury or property damage claim brought pursuant to MCL 691.1405, is vacated. MCR 7.215(J)(5).

Appellants may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk’s certification of this order. Appellees may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellants’ brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.

Gage, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court orders that a special panel be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm, 267 Mich App 274; 705 NW2d 136 (2005).

The Court further orders that part III of the opinion released on November 15, 2005, which addresses the availability of damages for loss of consortium in a bodily injury or property damage claim brought pursuant to MCL 691.1405, is vacated. MCR 7.215(J)(5).

Appellants may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk’s certification of this order. Appellees may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellants’ brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.

Gage, J., did not participate.

Kik v. Sbraccia, 268 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

268 Mich. App. 801 (Kik v. Sbraccia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related