Kight v. Ganymede Holdings II, Inc.

2012 NCBC 46

• Court: North Carolina Business Court
• Decided: August 21, 2012
• Docket: 11-CVS-15177
• Status: Published

Opinion

Kight v. Ganymede Holdings II, Inc., 2012 NCBC 46. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 11 CVS 15177

JOHN A. KIGHT and KIGHT'S MEDICAL ) CORP., ) Plaintiffs ) ) ORDER ON NOTICE v. ) OF DESIGNATION ) GANYMEDE HOLDINGS II, INC., VINCE E. ) COLE, PATRICK O'BRIEN and ACTIVA ) MEDICAL INC., ) Defendants )

THIS MATTER is before the court on Plaintiffs' Notice of Designation of Action as

Mandatory Complex Business Case Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-45.4(5) ("Notice of

Designation"), submitted via e-mail to the court on July 19, 2012; and

THE COURT, having reviewed Plaintiffs' Notice of Designation, Complaint,

Amended Complaint and other pertinent matters of record, FINDS and CONCLUDES

that the Notice of Designation is untimely under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-45.4 ("Mandatory

Statute").

Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint in this matter, upon which the Notice of

Designation is based, on June 22, 2012. Under Rule 3.1(b) of the General Rules of

Practice and Procedure for the North Carolina Business Court, a party amending a

pleading that raises a new material issue listed in subsection (a) of the Mandatory

Statute may file a notice of designation with respect to such new material issue within

the time periods set forth in subsection (d) of the Mandatory Statute. Subsection (d) of the Mandatory Statute provides that a plaintiff filing a notice of

designation shall do so "contemporaneously" with the filing of the complaint. Likewise,

a notice of designation based on an amended complaint shall be filed

contemporaneously with the amended complaint. In Ross v. Autumn House, Inc.,

Caldwell County No. 07 CVS 2172 (N.C. Super. Ct. Order Feb. 26, 2008), this court

interpreted "contemporaneously" in this context to mean within thirty days of the filing of

the complaint, relying on certain "guidelines" published on the website for the North

Carolina Business Court.

The court now reconsiders the requirement that a notice of designation be filed

contemporaneously with the complaint. To comply with this requirement, a plaintiff must

file a notice of designation at the same time the complaint—or amended complaint—is

filed. The "guidelines" referenced in the Ross Order were removed from the North

Carolina Business Court website in May 2012.

Plaintiffs' Notice of Designation in this matter was filed twenty-seven days after

the filing of the Amended Complaint. As such, Plaintiffs' Notice of Designation is

untimely, and this case should be REMANDED to Wake County Superior Court.

SO ORDERED, this the 21st day of August, 2012.