Kifle-Thompson v. Washington Mutual, Inc.

482 F. App'x 595
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 2012
DocketNo. 11-5287
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 482 F. App'x 595 (Kifle-Thompson v. Washington Mutual, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kifle-Thompson v. Washington Mutual, Inc., 482 F. App'x 595 (D.C. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. [596]*596R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 30, 2011, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellants’ complaint for failure to state a claim based on res judicata because appellants’ prior litigation in California involved the same facts and parties, which resulted in a valid judgment on the merits. Appellants’ claims against JP Morgan Chase, N.A. and U.S. Bank, N.A. were also properly dismissed because there was no allegation in the complaint of any wrongdoing by those banks.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. Bank of New York Mellon
District of Columbia, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
482 F. App'x 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kifle-thompson-v-washington-mutual-inc-cadc-2012.