Kietsathit v. Central Transport LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 7, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-02493·Unknown

Opinion

Kane Moon (SBN 249834) Allen Feghali (SBN 301080) Jacquelyne VanEmmerik (SBN 339338) 725 South Figueroa Street, 31st Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 232-3128 Facsimile: (213) 232-3125 Email: kmoon@moonlawgroup.com Email: afeghali@moonlawgroup.com Email: jvanemmerik@moonlawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Raymond Kietsathit and Andrew Ocon

Christian J. Keeney (SBN 269533) Alis M. Moon (SBN 293897) Semarnpreet Kaur (SBN 328518) 200 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 500 Irvine, CA 92618 Tel: (949) 885-1360 Fax: (949) 885-1380 Christian.Keeney@jacksonlewis.com Alis.Moon@jacksonlewis.com Semarnpreet.Kaur@jacksonlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant CENTRAL TRANSPORT LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND KIETSATHIT and Case No.: 2:24−cv−02493−KJM−JDP ANDREW OCON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Assigned to: Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller, Courtroom 3; Magistrate Judge Plaintiff, J eremy D. Peterson vs. [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CENTRAL TRANSPORT LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Action Filed: July 30, 2024 Action Removed: September 12, 2024 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery in this action may involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under applicable legal principles. The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file Confidential Information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a Party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT As a wage and hour class action, this action is likely to involve discovery of putative class members’ contact information and other sensitive information in which the putative class members have a legally protected privacy interest under the California Constitution. See, e.g., Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. v. Superior Court, 149 Cal. App. 4th 554 (2007). This action may additionally involve discovery of records that include commercial, financial and proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial information, tax filings, information regarding confidential business practices, and other confidential research, development, or commercial information, information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non- public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: RAYMOND KIETSATHIT and ANDREW OCON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. CENTRAL TRANSPORT LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; Case No2:24−CV−02493−KJM−JDP. 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Nonparty that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Nonparty that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 2.8 In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action. In-House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.9 Nonparty: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a Party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a Party and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm that has appeared on behalf of that Party, including support staff. 2.11 Party: any Party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Nonparty that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (for example, photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above) but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial will be governed by a separate agreement or the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order will remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition is the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice, or (2) final judgment after

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kietsathit v. Central Transport LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Kietsathit v. Central Transport LLC (Kietsathit v. Central Transport LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. v. Superior Court
57 Cal. Rptr. 3d 197 (California Court of Appeal, 2007)