Kietsathit v. Central Transport LLC

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedFebruary 7, 2025
Docket2:24-cv-02493
StatusUnknown

This text of Kietsathit v. Central Transport LLC (Kietsathit v. Central Transport LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kietsathit v. Central Transport LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 Kane Moon (SBN 249834) 2 Allen Feghali (SBN 301080) Jacquelyne VanEmmerik (SBN 339338) 3 MOON LAW GROUP, P.C. 725 South Figueroa Street, 31st Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 232-3128 5 Facsimile: (213) 232-3125 6 Email: kmoon@moonlawgroup.com Email: afeghali@moonlawgroup.com 7 Email: jvanemmerik@moonlawgroup.com

8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Raymond Kietsathit and Andrew Ocon 9

10 Christian J. Keeney (SBN 269533) Alis M. Moon (SBN 293897) 11 Semarnpreet Kaur (SBN 328518) 12 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 200 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 500 13 Irvine, CA 92618 Tel: (949) 885-1360 14 Fax: (949) 885-1380 Christian.Keeney@jacksonlewis.com 15 Alis.Moon@jacksonlewis.com 16 Semarnpreet.Kaur@jacksonlewis.com

17 Attorneys for Defendant CENTRAL TRANSPORT LLC 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20

21 RAYMOND KIETSATHIT and Case No.: 2:24−cv−02493−KJM−JDP 22 ANDREW OCON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Assigned to: Honorable Kimberly J. 23 Mueller, Courtroom 3; Magistrate Judge 24 Plaintiff, J eremy D. Peterson 25 vs. [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 26 CENTRAL TRANSPORT LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Action Filed: July 30, 2024 27 Action Removed: September 12, 2024 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 3 Disclosure and discovery in this action may involve production of confidential, proprietary, or 4 private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose 5 other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to 6 and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge 7 that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that 8 the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items 9 that are entitled to confidential treatment under applicable legal principles. The Parties further 10 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle 11 them to file Confidential Information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that 12 must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a Party seeks permission from the Court 13 to file material under seal. 14 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 15 As a wage and hour class action, this action is likely to involve discovery of putative class 16 members’ contact information and other sensitive information in which the putative class members 17 have a legally protected privacy interest under the California Constitution. See, e.g., Belaire-West 18 Landscape, Inc. v. Superior Court, 149 Cal. App. 4th 554 (2007). This action may additionally involve 19 discovery of records that include commercial, financial and proprietary information for which special 20 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action 21 is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 22 things, confidential business or financial information, tax filings, information regarding confidential 23 business practices, and other confidential research, development, or commercial information, 24 information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise 25 protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. 26 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes 27 over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled 1 to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material 2 in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and 3 to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the 4 intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that 5 nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non- 6 public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 7 2. DEFINITIONS 8 2.1 Action: RAYMOND KIETSATHIT and ANDREW OCON, individually, and on behalf of all 9 others similarly situated v. CENTRAL TRANSPORT LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; Case 10 No2:24−CV−02493−KJM−JDP. 11 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Nonparty that challenges the designation of information or 12 items under this Order. 13 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, 14 stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil 15 Procedure 26(c) and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 16 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 17 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Nonparty that designates information or items that it produces 18 in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 19 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or 20 manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 21 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 22 discovery in this matter. 23 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 24 litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant 25 in this action. 26 2.8 In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action. In-House 27 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 1 2.9 Nonparty: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity 2 not named as a Party to this action. 3 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a Party to this Action but 4 are retained to represent or advise a Party and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that Party or 5 are affiliated with a law firm that has appeared on behalf of that Party, including support staff. 6 2.11 Party: any Party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 7 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 8 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Nonparty that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in 9 this Action. 10 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (for 11 example, photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 12 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 13 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 14 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 15 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing 16 Party. 17 3. SCOPE 18 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 19 defined above) but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, 20 excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 21 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected 22 Material at trial will be governed by a separate agreement or the orders of the trial judge. This Order 23 does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 24 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. v. Superior Court
57 Cal. Rptr. 3d 197 (California Court of Appeal, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kietsathit v. Central Transport LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kietsathit-v-central-transport-llc-caed-2025.