Kieser v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kieser v. State

408 S.W.3d 798, 2013 WL 5230811, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1086

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 17, 2013·No. No. WD 75406·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Johnathon L. Kieser appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He alleges that plea counsel failed to inform him that he would be required by statute to serve eighty-five percent of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole consideration.

For reasons stated in the memorandum to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Johnathon L. Kieser appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He alleges that plea counsel failed to inform him that he would be required by statute to serve eighty-five percent of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole consideration.

For reasons stated in the memorandum to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Kieser v. State, 408 S.W.3d 798, 2013 WL 5230811, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1086 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

408 S.W.3d 798 (Kieser v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.