Kies v. Tifft
1 Cow. 98
Opinion
In our opinion, the Common Pleas erred. The defendants were hound to usé due diligence in collecting the money on the bond and mortgage, particularly as they were so directed by the plaintiff. They ought not to have suffered a term to pass, after the money fell due, without a prosecution. (Moakly v. Riggs, 19 John. 69.)
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kies v. Tifft, 1 Cow. 98 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).
1 Cow. 98 (Kies v. Tifft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crane v. Wheeler
50 N.W. 1033 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1892)
Salt Springs National Bank v. Sloan
11 N.Y.S. 32 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Northern Insurance v. Wright
20 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 166 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)
Dwight v. Williams
8 F. Cas. 187 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1849)