Kiers v. Rathjen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kiers v. Rathjen

60 Misc. 105, 111 N.Y.S. 599

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Misc. 105 (Kiers v. Rathjen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kiers v. Rathjen, 60 Misc. 105, 111 N.Y.S. 599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, the owner of a coal boat, sued to recover for damage done to his boat. The plaintiff’s claim is that the boat was carrying a consignment of coal to the defendant and that the boat was damaged by the negligent use of the “ digger ” employed by the defendant in unloading his boat. The defendant pleaded a general denial. One of the issues raised by the pleadings related to whether or not the defendant’s employees unloaded the boat. The evidence of the plaintiff upon this point was indefinite and inconclusive. The defendant attempted to prove that the coal had been consigned to the Jurgen Rathjen Company and that its employees unloaded the boat. The trial court excluded this evidence upon the ground that these facts could not be proved under a general, denial. In this ruling the learned trial judge erred. The plaintiff’s contention being that the employees of the defendant caused the damage to his boat, it was competent for the defendant, under a general denial, to prove that the damage complained of was caused by others for whose acts the defendant was not responsible. Griffin v. Long Island R. R. Co., 101 N. Y. 348, 354; Demarest v. Flack, 128 id. 205.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — Gildersleeve, MacLean and Seabury, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, the owner of a coal boat, sued to recover for damage done to his boat. The plaintiff’s claim is that the boat was carrying a consignment of coal to the defendant and that the boat was damaged by the negligent use of the “ digger ” employed by the defendant in unloading his boat. The defendant pleaded a general denial. One of the issues raised by the pleadings related to whether or not the defendant’s employees unloaded the boat. The evidence of the plaintiff upon this point was indefinite and inconclusive. The defendant attempted to prove that the coal had been consigned to the Jurgen Rathjen Company and that its employees unloaded the boat. The trial court excluded this evidence upon the ground that these facts could not be proved under a general, denial. In this ruling the learned trial judge erred. The plaintiff’s contention being that the employees of the defendant caused the damage to his boat, it was competent for the defendant, under a general denial, to prove that the damage complained of was caused by others for whose acts the defendant was not responsible. Griffin v. Long Island R. R. Co., 101 N. Y. 348, 354; Demarest v. Flack, 128 id. 205.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present — Gildersleeve, MacLean and Seabury, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Misc. 105, 111 N.Y.S. 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiers-v-rathjen-nyappterm-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack