Kiernan v. McKinley

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2009·No. 09-7551·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7551

JAVEN KIERNAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

P. MCKINLEY, R.N.; LAYTON LESTER, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00387-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 30, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Javen Kiernan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Javen Kiernan appeals the district court’s order

dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Kiernan v. McKinley, No. 1:09-cv-00387-LMB-TCB (E.D.

Va. July 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kiernan v. McKinley, (4th Cir. 2009).

Kiernan v. McKinley (Kiernan v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related