Kiely v. C.A. Sharrow Ford, Inc.

174 A.D.2d 1013, 572 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8945

This text of 174 A.D.2d 1013 (Kiely v. C.A. Sharrow Ford, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kiely v. C.A. Sharrow Ford, Inc., 174 A.D.2d 1013, 572 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs summary judgment on liability under the Used Car Lemon Law (see, General Business Law § 198-b). There is an issue of fact whether plaintiffs notified the dealer of the failure of a covered part within the specified warranty period (see, General Business Law § 198-b [b] [3]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 A.D.2d 1013, 572 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kiely-v-ca-sharrow-ford-inc-nyappdiv-1991.