Kieldsen v. Barrett
284 U.S. 581, 52 S. Ct. 28
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substaiitial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kieldsen v. Barrett, 284 U.S. 581, 52 S. Ct. 28 (1931).
284 U.S. 581 (Kieldsen v. Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wabash Railroad v. Flannigan
192 U.S. 29 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Erie Railroad v. Solomon
237 U.S. 427 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. Smith
278 U.S. 191 (Supreme Court, 1929)