Kielczewski v. Pinnacle Restoration Corp.
This text of 226 A.D.2d 211 (Kielczewski v. Pinnacle Restoration Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered August 15, 1995, which granted defendants’ motions for a change of venue from Bronx County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
[212]*212Although defendant general partnership’s business certificate lists its office "c/o” a Bronx County address, the IAS Court properly considered other evidence, namely, the affidavits of the general partners that the partnership’s principal office has always been in New Jersey or Westchester County, in finding that none of the parties reside in Bronx County (see, Wolpo v Sunrise Mall Assocs., 202 AD2d 209). We reject plaintiff’s request that Queens County be designated as an alternative venue to the Bronx, there being evidence that Bronx County was not a proper forum in the first instance, and that plaintiff should therefore be deemed to have forfeited her right to select venue (Kelson v Nedicks Stores, 104 AD2d 315). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D.2d 211, 640 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kielczewski-v-pinnacle-restoration-corp-nyappdiv-1996.