Kiel v. Kiel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kiel v. Kiel

333 S.W.3d 490, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1741, 2010 WL 5174943

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 21, 2010·No. ED 94698·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Kiel (“Husband”) and Heather Kiel (“Wife”) were granted a dissolution of marriage on January 12, 2010. In his sole point on appeal, Husband claims that the trial court erred in entering the judgment and decree of dissolution because Wife obtained the judgment through fraud.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Kiel (“Husband”) and Heather Kiel (“Wife”) were granted a dissolution of marriage on January 12, 2010. In his sole point on appeal, Husband claims that the trial court erred in entering the judgment and decree of dissolution because Wife obtained the judgment through fraud.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Kiel v. Kiel, 333 S.W.3d 490, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1741, 2010 WL 5174943 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

333 S.W.3d 490 (Kiel v. Kiel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related