Kieffer v. Victor Land Co.

90 P. 582, 53 Or. 174, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 183
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided December 29, 1908·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam :

1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal as a suit in equity, on the grounds: (1) That the printed abstract does not contain an index or assignment of errors; and (2) that the transcript of the evidence does not include all the testimony given in the court below. The omission- of an index and an assignment of errors in the abstract was due to an oversight, and a sufficient showing has been made to justify the court in allowing the abstract to be amended in that regard.

A failure to send up all the testimony in an equity suit is no ground for the dismissal of an appeal. The pleadings and findings of fact may present questions for review in this court.

The motion to dismiss will therefore be overruled, and any defect in the testimony can be urged upon the final hearing, if the appellant seeks to have reviewed the findings made by the trial court.

Motion Overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kieffer v. Victor Land Co., 90 P. 582, 53 Or. 174, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 183 (Or. 1908).

90 P. 582 (Kieffer v. Victor Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jensen v. Probert
148 P.2d 248 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1944)
Parker v. Daly
114 P. 926 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1911)