Kieffer v. Victor Land Co.

90 P. 582, 53 Or. 174, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 183
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 29, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 90 P. 582 (Kieffer v. Victor Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kieffer v. Victor Land Co., 90 P. 582, 53 Or. 174, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 183 (Or. 1908).

Opinions

Per Curiam :

1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal as a suit in equity, on the grounds: (1) That the printed abstract does not contain an index or assignment of errors; and (2) that the transcript of the evidence does not include all the testimony given in the court below. The omission- of an index and an assignment of errors in the abstract was due to an oversight, and a sufficient showing has been made to justify the court in allowing the abstract to be amended in that regard.

A failure to send up all the testimony in an equity suit is no ground for the dismissal of an appeal. The pleadings and findings of fact may present questions for review in this court.

The motion to dismiss will therefore be overruled, and any defect in the testimony can be urged upon the final hearing, if the appellant seeks to have reviewed the findings made by the trial court.

Motion Overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jensen v. Probert
148 P.2d 248 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1944)
Parker v. Daly
114 P. 926 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 P. 582, 53 Or. 174, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kieffer-v-victor-land-co-or-1908.