Kieffer v. Taylor-Morley, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kieffer v. Taylor-Morley, Inc.

139 S.W.3d 572, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 535, 2004 WL 834206

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 20, 2004

DocketED 82933

StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.W.3d 572 (Kieffer v. Taylor-Morley, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kieffer v. Taylor-Morley, Inc., 139 S.W.3d 572, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 535, 2004 WL 834206 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carolynne M. Kieffer appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing with prejudice, on the grounds of res judicata, her petition against Taylor-Morley, Inc., and Taylor-Morley Management Co., Inc. We affirm. 1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Kieffer’s Motion to Strike is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI