Kieffer v. Kieffer

103 S.W.3d 164, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 96, 2003 WL 179363
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 28, 2003
DocketNo. ED 80592
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 S.W.3d 164 (Kieffer v. Kieffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kieffer v. Kieffer, 103 S.W.3d 164, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 96, 2003 WL 179363 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Kieffer appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Nancy Kieffer to enforce an oral settlement agreement.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kieffer v. Kieffer
129 S.W.3d 446 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)
Kieffer v. Kieffer
540 U.S. 983 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.W.3d 164, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 96, 2003 WL 179363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kieffer-v-kieffer-moctapp-2003.