Kieffer v. Huebner

525 N.W.2d 250, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 220, 1994 WL 722121
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 27, 1994
DocketCiv. No. 940165
StatusPublished

This text of 525 N.W.2d 250 (Kieffer v. Huebner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kieffer v. Huebner, 525 N.W.2d 250, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 220, 1994 WL 722121 (N.D. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joan and Peter Kieffer appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. Kieffers argue the trial court’s order of denial was a manifest abuse of discretion.

We affirm under Rule 35.1(a)(4), N.D.R.App.P.

VANDE WALLE, C.J., and SANDSTROM, NEUMANN, LEVINE and MESCHKE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 N.W.2d 250, 1994 N.D. LEXIS 220, 1994 WL 722121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kieffer-v-huebner-nd-1994.